Search This Blog

Showing posts with label guilford. Show all posts
Showing posts with label guilford. Show all posts

Monday, March 31, 2025

Guilford Country Resignaling Updates

With the re-signaling of the former Guilford Rail System/Boston & Maine Western Route Main Line accelerating rapidly, I managed to carry out a multi-day road trip to gauge the situation and take what photos I could. With the re-signaling already complete between the Mass border an the Exeter, NH area I started at Dover, NH and worked my way north to Saco, ME.

My first discovery was that CSX was doing more than just swapping out the signaling and the signal rules. Outside of the MBTA zone the interlockings have all been renamed from the Guilford era CPF-Milepost format to location based names, some of which call back to B&M telegraph cores and others more modern things like road names. Overall this marks an improvement as the CPF names were a result of the crazy Guilford owner kitbashing a 715 mile long main line between Mattawamkeag, ME and Sunbury, PA in 1981. Changing the interlocking names was actually in support of moving away from the Guilford's "Freight Main Line" 0 to 715 mileposts. Unfortunately CSX did not restore the original B&M mileposts from Boston and instead established an MP 0 in Portland Maine that increases as one travels west. Although the chaining was not changed, stone "Boston" mileposts defaced with spray paint instead of reused.

Main track Clear at CPF-243

New signal bridge at Rollingsford Jct

In the Dover area the B&M signaling, including classic signal gantries, is very much on its way out. The holdout signals at CPF-244 in downtown Dover are also going to be removed without replacement due to the reduced need for switching movements that need to occupy the main line. Dover actually represents a bit of a B&M signaling island right now as just over the Main border, double tracking improvements have already ushered in Seaboard signaling all the way through Wells, ME.


Part of these improvements include a new full crossover designated WILLIE west of the Wells, ME Downeaster station. The only details of note is that standard CSX switch procurement is now from Apex and the color light signal modules are now from Progress Rail instead of Safetran.

Milepost 211 searchlight automatic. Note the new CSX milepost number.

The section between Wells and Saco was re-signaled by Guilford in the 1990's with brand new SA searchlights, however new signal mast footings are in place at all of the locations as CSX can't let us have nice things.  CSX has also replaced all of the former Guilford defect detectors with brand new units, which runs counter to their practice after the Conrail merger where CR readouts lingered for over a decade.

Turned signal mast at Saco.

At Saco a turned target type signal awaits an unknown fate. The sale to CSX caught some of the Guilford's own re-signaling projects in mid-stride. If any Federal funds were used as part of Downeaster service improvements, it might be difficult for CSX to scrap this work so we will have to see what they choose to do. 

CPF-LO w/b dwarfs

The corridor between Lowell and Ayer has seen no recent activity on the part of CSX. This might be due to the state of Mass owning all of part of the infrastructure or just the lack of passenger operations bumping down the priority. I am pretty sure the state owns the Northern Route Main Line to the wye junction north of town and possibly to the New Hampshire border and plans for Nashua commuter rail will likely dissuade CSX from making changes the government might ultimately pay for. While I already reported on the re-signaling of Lowell's BY interlocking by MBTA, CPF-LO west of the station is intact, although all connections to MBTA tracks have been cut. 

CPF-307 eb-B&M signal bridge


CPF-307 new w/b searchlight mast.

The ABS signals and CTC siding on the Guilford track between Lowell and Ayer are also intact with each end of the siding featuring an intact B&M signal bridge. CPF-307 even has what appears to be a fairly new 3-head searchlight mast, although it is unclear if this was carried out under CSX or Guilford.

Friday, February 28, 2025

Caught on Camera: Double Green Clear

 With the CSX takeover of the former Guilford Rail System empire, there's a real risk that we might see the end of double green clear signal indications in the wild. Most commonly associated with the New York Central, double green clear is an artifact of two position ABS semaphore signals with an upper head of R+G and a lower head of Y+G resulting in the combination of R/Y for Stop and Proceed, G/Y for Approach and G/G for clear. A part of the NORAC set of signal indications, its last common use was in New Englande on the former Boston and Main territory operated by the Guilford Rail System and the MBTA.

As previously covered, while Guilford wasn't perfect it did maintain a bunch of legacy signaling practices, like bracket masts, up into the 21st century. Even in places where new signals were being installed, two head "distant" signals to interlockings would still display G/G as opposed to G/R. In fact you can see it for yourself on Google Street view on the milepost 2xx intermediate signal adjacent to the Main St grade crossing in downtown Saco, Maine

Lit for an approaching train we see double green clear displayed on a thoroughly modern target type LED mast signal. In fact I saw this street view while scouting Guilford automatic signal locations on Google Maps and was not only able to locate the normally dark (approach lit) signal, but catch it displaying the coveted indication for a northbound Downeaster train. 

Unfortunately it appears that this location will be replaced by CSX within the year with no chance of it retaining the double green clear. However with 5 round trips a day, its pretty easy for anyone in the area to  catch it for themselves. 

Saturday, November 30, 2024

CSX Accelerates Boston and Maine Resignaling

It appears that CSX has put its foot to the floor regarding resignaling the former Boston and Main Eastern Route Main Line. From the MBTA division post at CP-PLAISTOW to Exeter, new signals are already in place with prep work underway between Exeter and the Maine border. 

Blocks are being lengthened from 2 to 3 miles and even the LED target signals recently installed by Guilford are being replaced. Perhaps the most shocking turn of events is the conversion from NORAC to Seaboard signal rules, despite the presence of NORAC rules and cab signals on both MBTA and former Boston Line territory. This also closes the door on any potential Rule 562 cab signal conversion, even if all of the locomotives running on the line will have to be cab signal equipped. It is unclear when the new signaling will be cut over as CSX has been known to move quickly on new hardware before following up with the logic and testing, but I would suggest that any interested parties move with all possible speed to get their photos, and maybe some video of the flashing Green single dwarf Limited Speed signal at CP-PLAINSTOW.

Saturday, September 14, 2024

CSX Demolishes New Hampshire's Penultimate Tower

The effects of CSX's takeover of the Guilford Rail System is already becoming apparent as I have discovered that New Hampshire's second to last surviving interlocking tower, MA in Manchester, has been demolished. Never a big state for main line railroading, New Hampshire did have some fairly robust Boston and Maine infrastructure in the Merrimack River Valley between Nashua and Concord. The B&M had a thing for placing towers at the end of yards and had such towers in the cities of Manchester and Concord.  Both towers were low level brick and concrete "cabin" types built around 1944 to the same plan and designed around a unit lever (CTC style) console and associated local relays.

B&M MA(nchester) Tower, just visible behind the tree line at center left.

CSX's chosen victim was MA tower in Manchester, which is especially vexing because as you can see in the photo above, I had been a stone's throw away taking photos of the deactivated remains of CPN-28 in October, 2022, only becoming aware of the tower's existence after I got home. I had plans to re-visit the area, but had not been able to put them into effect by the time the tower was demolished in May of 2024. Luckily a local urban explorer visited the tower in February, 2024. According to a history published by the Boston and Maine Historical Society, the tower first gained CTC control of the entire New Hampshire Route Main Line in the 1950's before closing entirely in 1974.



In a bit of good news, the tower in Concord had been identified some years ago by local preservationists who are currently involved in its restoration. The story behind the preservation effort is told in the video below. Unless something has been overlooked it is believed to be New Hampshire's last standing purpose built interlocking tower.

Once again the lesson is to be aware of your surroundings and do the research before you go on an expedition.  This was not even the first time I missed something in Manchester as in the fall of 2020 I had failed to get photos of CPN-28 before it was taken out of service despite performing a historic walking tour just a half mile away. 

Saturday, August 24, 2024

When Urbex Meets Signaling

While there is a lot of crossover between the urban exploration (Urbex) community and the rail enthusiast community, the Ven diagram doesn't quite work the way you think it does as there is both the type of enthusiasm the individual is involves with (rail, urbex or both) and the type of things they explore.  When railfans explore rail stuff, they tend to put the resulting content in the rail bin, even if they are also into Urbex.  Qualified railfans know the jargon and historical details to properly label their content, rendering it searchable and discoverable. On the other hand, Urbex people who aren't railfans, can get into a lot of interesting rail places, yet have little idea of what they are looking at, therefore harming discovery.

Not so long ago I found some critical WINSLOW tower interior photos from 2003 on an urbex blog site that just hadn't happened to appear on casual google searches until recently. In the same vein, I also found a great exploration of the former PRR MG tower on the famous East Slope between the Horseshoe Curve and the summit at Gallitzin. I routinely search for new "interlocking tower" videos, but not "switch tower" because the genericness of the term returns a lot of bad results.  It was only after several years would YouTube searches include this video in my interlocking tower search due to the key words in the comments.

Despite their lack of historical context, the Urbex community can assist the railfan community by being willing to generally take more risks than railfans. In this example MG tower is known to see increased police patrols to the point where the risk of visiting is well known.  On the other hand, Urbex folk don't care about getting train photos and can put more effort into not being see in addition to just having more experience in not being seen. Therefore, while railfans steered clear of MG, this guy was able to made a comprehensive video documentation. Another popular urbex assist has been the Hoosac Tunnel in northwestern Massachusetts, which sees both explorers and ghost-hunters occasionally getting some footage of the searchlight signals inside.   

Anyway, the next time you are looking for some open source intelligence on some hard to access signaling artifact, try to use some urbex search terms. You might find something surprising.



Sunday, December 31, 2023

2023 Searchlight News

 For the last post of 2023 I'm going to go through my backlog of searchlight related news items. First up is the Florida East Coast where we are all aware of the re-signaling in the Brightline Zone, but it appears that the remaining searchlights on the north end are also on the way out. The Bayard siding, just south of Jacksonville, had no evidence of signal replacement in Feb 2023, but new masts were in place by September.

Up on the former B&M Main Line east of the CSX zone in Ayer, there was been a good deal of searchlight attrition, but this has been a piecemeal process and at milepost 425 near the VT/NY state line the MP 435 searchlight was still standing as of may 2023.

East of Ayer CSX hasn't quite had enough time to start re-signaling projects as they are still trying to rebuild the connector from Warcester to Ayer. Getting out to the two searchlit interlockings between the Lowell and Fitchburg MBTA zones are high on my list.

Up on the former Montana Rail Link the searchlight replacement is ongoing with new signals up around EAST BOZEMAN.

Unfortunately around 2019-2022 many remaining searchlights on the BNSF San Bernardino Sub lost its ATSF vintage searchlights except for a few around the Riverside Station.

Finally on the UP/BNSF Joint Line south of Denver, an interesting situation has developed where CTC has been added to one of the two former single direction ABS tracks and the other has been left as ABS with no PTC due to a lack of need. This has at least temporarily saved a number of searchlights, including the mast at Milepost 226.8 just of US 85 north of Castle Rock, which has had a replacement hovering over it since 2018.

That's all for now. Remember there's no time like the present to get out and get your photos. I'll be doing a followup piece on re-signaling on the New England Central line in the CT River Valley in a few months.

Saturday, December 24, 2022

MBTA Re-Signaling Project Reaches Lowell

An update for my previous reports on MBTA's re-signaling efforts on Boston's north side commuter lines.This project consists of installing cab signals and Rule 562 operation on all or part of the North Side lines as well as the general replacement of GRS SA-type searchlight signals. In fall of 2020 the project had already commenced, but there was no sign of it at CPF-BY in Lowell when I stopped by for a visit. 

In fact I even documented ongoing maintenance work on what appeared to be brand new replacement SA heads.

Well recent photos indicate that the re-signaling work has no only reached CPF-BY, but also also replaced the GRA SA searchlight dwarfs with L&W LED searchlight dwarfs, which I guess is better than Safetran cube stacks.

At this point there is no information about CPF-LO, CPF-WA and CPF-NC located beyond the end of MBTA operations at Lowell, but before the end of MBTA ownership at CPF-NC. I suspect this might become a signaling sanctuary as CSX would want to avoid needing to run cab signal or ACSES equipped leaders here and the MBTA would want to hold out for Federal rebuild money to extend service to Nashua.

CPF-NC in late 2021 showing no signs of change.

Additional reports indicate that CSX has dropped new signals at CPF-309 and/or CPF-307 which would be in line with their plans to assimilate the old Guilford territory.  No word if the new signals are CSX standard hoods or Guilford/MBTA targets and also if CSX is planning to run Rule 562 as all Boston Line locomotives will be cab signal equipped and multiple sections of the old Freight Main Line will have MBTA cab signals.

Sunday, September 4, 2022

B&M's Centralized Manual Block: The Worst CTC

The Guilford Rail System and to some extent is predecessor Boston and Maine Railroad, had a reputation for stinginess despite being one of the more "interesting" railroads signal wise. In 2014 the formerly Guilford owned Connecticut River Main Line was restored for passenger operation that had been routed off the line in 1987 due to poor track condition.  I took a trip over this route via Amtrak's Vermonter in 2021 and posted a trip report covering the new Guilford style LED target signals, bracket masts as well as surviving instances of searchlights both in Massachusetts and on the New England Central owned portion of the line in Vermont north of the Mass border. However I missed something pretty important in that trip report that only became salient when I was processing all of the photos. Before I try and explain it I'll show a sample of the pre-rebuild Guilford Employee Timetable for the route.

At first view this looks like a pretty common Rule 261/CTC setup, an interlocking, some bi-directional intermediates.  However if you look closely you'll see that each of the two intermediates, shown at mileposts 2 and 7, are distant to the CPR-1 and CPR-9 (not pictured) respectively. That creates a rather unusual 5 mile long block in the middle of the bi-directional single track section that would be broken up by an industry standard 2-3 mile long block. Although this setup was modified in 2014, it was not modified much with a new interlocking CPR-2 eliminating the very long block with a dual distant at milepost 5 for a relocated controlled point CPR-8. The next line segment had a 6.5 mile northbound block replaced with another two 3 mile blocks with the milepost 13 intermediate.  However the third line segment is where things go off the rails again with a massive 8 mile long automatic block between the mileposts 20 and 28 intermediates.


The CT River Line changes ownership at the Massachusetts border reflecting the historic split between the Boston and Main and the Vermont Central.  No matter the ownership however, where the line had been upgraded from Track Warrant/Form D to CTC, the block lengths are reasonable, however wherever the Boston and Main had installed CTC, megablocks are the norm. In fact, on the former Boston and Maine signaled territory controlled by the NECR, the situation is even worse with the intermediate signals acting as single direction distants only similar to Amtrak's 562 cab signal territory, just without the cab signal blocks. The controlled signals in advance of the single track segments are the only indications of block status until the distant signal 2 miles short of the next interlocking. 

This creates automatic blocks of 6 miles south of Putney, 11 miles south of Bellows Falls, 10 miles south of Wapole , 14(!) miles south of Claremont and then a comparatively reasonable 6 miles south of Windsor. North of Windsor a new CTC extension has reasonably spaced blocks of about 3 miles each. At the time of my journey I figured I was just doing a bad job looking out for and photographing intermediate signals, however upon further review I wasn't missing anything, The Boston and Main had employed CTC with manual block distances and setups. If this had been the PRR they could have replaced Clear, Approach and Restricting indications at the ends of sidings with Clear Block, Caution and Permissive Block.

While this sort of layout might seem to be a clever twist of frugality, it is in fact an example of the adage "The Stingy Man Pays the Most".  Not only is the capacity not much better than with manual block/track warrant, ANY track circuit failure in ANY of these super blocks will result in a Restricting signal indication at best or, more likely, a permission past stop signal. The next choice is a 10 mile slog at Restricted speed (elapsed time 30+ minutes) or a dispatcher process to temporarily replace signal rules with TWC/DCS rules if that is even possible thanks to whatever is causing the track circuit problem, like a broken rail. This explains in part why the poor maintenance of the Guilford years formed Amtrak to move off the CT River Line and seize by eminent domain the segment between Vermon and Windsor. Any signal problem would instantly cause a 30 minute delay in addition to all the bad order track. In summary this setup might work for low density lines with some passenger trains that need better protection than track warrants. However if track circuit integrity is taken seriously, this setup is highly fragile. It's no wonder that setups such as this are somewhat more popular with axle counters substituting for track circuit integrity.



Friday, May 20, 2022

CSX Bags Guilford But When to Expect Change?

CSx is set to complete its purchase of the former Guilford Rail System (currently branded pan Am Railways) on June 1, 2022.  However does this mean to immediately expect the end of NORAC Rules, searchlight signals and bracket masts? Well according to some initial reports the community will enjoy at least a slight reprieve before CSX has the opportunity to go to town on the Boston and Maine's legacy.

Guilford searchlights and the Lowell Wye.

As of now CSX plans to make no changes to former Guilford operations until October, 2022 due to the existing collective bargaining agreements and delays to the sale of the Pan Am Southern joint venture to a G&W subsidiary.  This means NORAC Rules and signal indications will remain in service until that point and it is unlikely that CSX will embark in any large scale re-signaling investments. CSX will also need to improve/signal the line between Worcester and Ayre to actually connect the former Guilford Freight main Line with its former Conrail Boston Line.

Boston Line CP-45 at Worcester

In the longer term, use of Rule 562 cab signal without fixed wayside signals on both the former MBTA territory as well as the Boston Line will likely keep the former Guilford territory under firmly under CSX's legacy "Conrail" signal rules, even if the operating rules change. How PTC is integrated into the new territory remains to be seen as MBTA lines that share the former Guilford Freight Main Line route around Lowell, Ayre and Haverhill, will be ACSES and cab signal equipped. It is entirely possible that CSX will choose to complete the look and install 562 between Worcester and Ayre and as part of any re-signaling projects on the Freight Main Line, including the Downeaster corridor north of Haverhill. 

Boston Line CP-187 with Conrail Small Target Searchlights

 As has been observed on the Boston Line, Darth Vader type signals have been slowly supplanting those of Conrail vintage, however this process is not complete after 20 years due to the young age of the vintage Conrail signaling. Fortunately the former Pan Am Southern covers both the Freight Main Line to Mechanicville, NY and the CT Valley Line used by Amtrak. The latter was recently re-signaled in the Guilford style with the remainder getting a mix of Darth Vaders and Guilford signals in any re-signaling projects.  I suspect the orphan nature of this route will further stunt investment, hopefully prolonging the life of the remaining B&M vintage searchlight equipment and US&S pulse code CTC .

Sunday, March 13, 2022

2022 Hudson Valley News

My 2022 road trip up the Hudson River valley uncovered several more newsworthy elements than I had encountered in 2021.  The first and foremost of these is that Amtrak has likely completed its refresh of signaling at Hudson Line interlockings with the anticipation of eventual Rule 562 operation.  Although no 'C lamps have been fitted, the Conrail era searchlight signals have been replaced by Safetran modules LED target signals.  At CP-103 these are in new masts at the same location and at CP-114 they have been mounted on the legacy tubular cantilever masts.  In 2021 footings for new signals were in place at CP-94, likely spelling the doom of the bracket mast there. I do not have information about the signals at CP-124 or CP-125.

CP-114

CP-103

At intermediate signal locations the searchlights are still in place and little/no work has been started to install solid state "signal indication point" huts.


In the Mechanicville, NY area, the last gasp of Canadian searchlights are still in place at CPF-470 and adjacent interlockings.  These use a custom housing to hold what are probably railroad-stock searchlight mechanisms.


I also noticed that the entrance signals to the former Boston and Main / Guilford Rail System Freight Main Line at CPF-467 was protected by GE branded signal heads that were a thing due to their takeover of Harmon Electronics. This is fitting given GE's presence in the area.

 

The former NY Central XO tower in Mechanicville has been taken over by the local Chamber of Commerce and someone is building a model railroad layout in the former opeator's level.

Finally I can confirm that the ancient searchlight mast on the former D&H Colonie Sub in Cohoes, NY has been replaced by a CP style Vader mast about a quarter mile to the north of the old location.


Well that's all the news from upstate.  Not great, but not terrible.

Monday, September 20, 2021

Vermonter Route Signaling Report

I recently completed a trip on Amtrak's Vermonter all the way to White River Junction, which covers all of the signaling on the route.  The Vermonter passes through three signaling regions each with their own unique features, the Amtrak Springfield Line, the Boston and Maine CT River Line and the New Englande Central main line.

 

HAYDEN interlocking northbound.  Start of Rule 261 territory.

The Amtrak Springfield Line has made headlines with a recent 110mph upgrade programme and support of the Hartford Commuter Rail line.  This involved restoration of the double track south of Hartford and Rule 562 signaling (cab signals w/o wayside signals).  However one might not know that the Rule 562 only extends to HAYDEN interlocking about 6 miles north of Hartford where beyond that trains still run under Rule 261/CSS.

New Unilens signals at CP-98

At the Springfield the signaling is much the same since I was last there, but I can confirm that the US&S 3 lamp modular and N-2 dwarfs are still in place at SPRING interlocking.  On the former Conrail Boston Line, CSX has indeed replaced all of the SA searchlight dwarfs at CP-98 with Unilens dwarfs.  CP-97 was previously re-signaled with 3 and 4 stack Safetran modular dwarfs.

New and classic signals at CPF-385

On the CT River Main Line, which was rebuilt and re-signaled around 2014, standard modern Guilford signaling applies with 3-head home signals and offset heads on two head intermediate signals.  Single Green clear is in use as opposed to double green.  The one exception is at the junction with the east-west freight main line at CPF-385 where the Freight Main Line signals remain B&M searchlights.

Budget bracket mast at Putney.

On the New Englande Central part of the line things get a bit odd. Leaving the CT River Main and its CTC at East Northfield, the line is run under TWC through Brattleboro to the siding at Putney where CTC begins. North of Putney all controlled siding and diamond crossing interlockings are equipped with searchlight signals except for the south end of the Putney siding that has Vader type color lights and a strange budget southbound bracket bast. Much of the block signaling south of Windsor is still searchlight, but the blocks seem very long with some stretching the entire distance between sidings with a single direction distant mast.  North of Windsor the CTC was a recent TWC upgrade with color light masts and what felt like 3 mile blocks.

TLDR the important thing is the searchlight interlockings on the NECR.  Safe from the Guilford sale to CSX, but still targets for potential infrastructure spending.  If you are in the area, check them out and take photos.


Monday, August 30, 2021

MBTA Putting Cab Signals w/o Waysides on Guilford Main Line

 I had previously reported on the conversion of at least some North Side MBTA lines to a system of cab signals without wayside signals as part of the ACSES PTC project.  However for some time the Guilford Rail System had been resisting this as they were not required to install PTC and they did also not utilize cab signals on their system.  Therefore imagine my surprise when I discovered that the Guilford Freight Main Line between CPY-WF and the end of passenger service at Wachusett.  

 


Technically the portion west of CPF-AY in Ayer is part of the NS Pan Am Southern joint venture and with CSX still trying to purchase the Guilford, two cab signal users would dismember the Guilford and would have equipped locomotives available to lead on the freight main line.  Still, dealing with cab signal islands is a major headache and it is further puzzling that waysideless cab signals (NORAC Rule 562) would be the preferred method between the back-to-back  CPF-AY and CPF-WF where the MBTA trains exit towards Boston.  Perhaps the plan is to be able to dive NORAC Rule 280a, Clear to Next Interlocking, bor unequipped movements. 

 

Regardless, we have seen with SEPTA that it seems easier to equip two types of PTC systems than mixing trains equipped and unequipped with cab signals.  CSX literally SEPTA-rated itself from SEPTA to avoid a situation similar to what the Guilford is acquiescing to. The good news is that Guilford style signals including target heads and bracket masts are being used in this project.  Unfortunately it is likely that fairly new Guilford intermediates with offset heads and double green clear indications may be removed prematurely. 


In an interesting turn of events, Guilford or the MBTA have decided to spring for genuine US&S NR-1 target type signal heads instead of an off brand modular approach. No way CSX or any other potential owner would do such a thing.

Saturday, December 5, 2020

What a Potential Guilford Sale to CSX Means

 I previously reported on how the eccentric owner of the railroad formerly known as the Guilford Rail System was calling it quits.  With the previous Pan Am Southern joint venture, NS was a likely suitor as it would complete its move into the New Englande market, however an independent operator like G&W or RJ Corpsman was equally likely given the generally declining freight and heavy industry scene in New Englande  and the cost advantages a non-legacy carrier would bring to the table.  Well, as you already know the first buyer to make a move was CSX, and although it faces potential regulatory opposition from both NS and a Biden administration looking to decrease corporate consolidation, we should take a quick look at what a CSX purchase would mean. 


As discussed in my two previous posts on the unique signaling quirks of the Guilford system, while the system isn't perfect it is at least different.  For example, while its commitment to target style signals outside of MBTA territory has been waning, it has remained committed to the bracket mast and offset signal heads on automatics.  Both of these can be expected to vanish under CSX Administration. 


The Guilford is also pretty lazy about demolishing disused signaling infrastructure like towers and old signal bridges.  CSX is far more proactive in this regard.  While the Guilford is slowly replacing old signaling where necessary, the CSX will likely embark on major re-signaling efforts that will zap large swaths of whatever heritage signaling remains, especially since, as a Class 1, CSX would be required to install PTC where the Guilford was largely exempt .  Of course when we're talking about swaths what remains to be lost pretty much only includes between the Mass Border and Portland, ME and  Andover, MA and Ayer, MA excluding the MBTA Lowell Terminal.  The couple hundred miles between Ayer and Mechanicsville, NY is part of the NS joint venture and might see a decline in investment due to CSX not wanting to help a competitor. 


Because of the cab signaled Conrail Boston Line, CSX has shown little interest in changing this part of its territory over to Seaboard style signals and this is likely to apply to the Guilford territory due to the new PTC related MBTA cab signaling projects on what will include parts of the Guilford freight main such as Andover to Haverhill (plus the reality of MBTA joint trackage). Still, use of lunar restricting and other Seaboardisms might become more common.  I would certainly expect the B&M heritage double green clear to vanish for good. One positive might be the more standard inclusion of a Restricting capability at all interlockings, something the Guilford tends to pass on (along with Canadian Pacific for that matter).

That's pretty much it, more darths, less brackets, PTC and more scrapage in general. The ideal buyer for the Guilford is a private party of existing Class II or III operator that will have limited capital resources of upgrades.  Even the garishly painted G&W would be an improvement seeing as how they have maintained B&O CPLs on their B&P property in Central Pennsylvania.


Sunday, August 30, 2020

MBTA Installing New Searchlights in Lowell

I know this is the third MBTA post in a row, but I was preparing for a trip there, which led to some discoveries, and then actually went on a trip there, which lead to further discoveries.  In this instance the news is wholly positive as when I was taking a little walk around CPF-BY south of the Lowell MBTA station I noticed that MBTA signal crews were in the process of installing new replacement GRS SA searchlight signals.


Here on this dwarf signal you can see the brand new mounting hardware, base and signal cable.  However I know this is rather weak evidence of the "newness" of searchlights, but I actually showed up when the signal crews were part way done installing the refurbished searchlight dwarfs.


Hey, break time is break time, even if you're only half way through your work task.  They literally dropped what they were doing leaving the searchlight signal housing wide open.  If you look at the full resolution you can see a 1980's style GRS identification plate.


Anyway, I hope to get back to the Lowell area soon.  Lots of interesting signaling there that appears ready to stick it out in the long term.