View From the Head End

Recently a Youtube channel appeared called View From The Head End, that was posting complete head end cab videos from Amtrak trains. These were not the more typical "reversed" videos taken from a rear facing window, but legit head end videos that documented both signals and signaling. More significantly the videos were up to date, likely all recorded within the last couple of years. My first thought was that someone had recently retired because since the early 2000's Amtrak (and I assume most railroads) have been somewhat anal about employees moonlighting as content creators. Well, I guess they hadn't retired because if you haven't noticed the link is broken and the entire channel is gone.

While the practice of workers recording head end videos to feed Youtube channels seems to be quite common in Europe (where I should add its practically impossible to fire railway workers), there are surprisingly few full-line inside-the-cab videos from North America. Up through the early 2000's there was a cottage industry head end videos being sold at "Train Shows" on either VHS or DVD. Some of these were professionally produced by outfits like Pantex, while others were made by AV savvy employees with access to a Hi-8 camera and a capture card. Unfortunately the rise of The Internet brought this wildcat era of video to an end as the speed of information made it easier for previously underground works to become known by regulators, the media and lawyers.

In the early years of Youtube, spotty internet connections and the more ephemeral nature of online data encouraged folks to save off important video content like head end videos. This practiced has decreased as the internet became more reliable overall, however when you find something that seems too good to last, you might want to leap into action and save off a local copy. In a sliver of good news I was able to watch some of the videos before they vanished and resolve some outstanding signal questions I had.

Meanwhile if you'd like something similar to watch I can provide two pairs of videos from the late 2000's covering an Acela trip from Boston to NYP (head end) and the Former Conrail Chicago Line between Buffalo and Albany (rear facing). Intended for Train Show (tm) sale both had been scrubbed of ambient cab sounds and the Chicago Line also being video reversed (which I was able to undo). Although mostly silent, the Chicago Line video in particular captures the NYC/Conrail signaling immediately before its complete replacement ~2010.

New Pittsburgh Line Interlockings

Norfolk Southern's ability to extort the state of Pennsylvania to add additional passenger frequencies on the old Pennsylvania Railroad Main Line is resulting in a slew capacity expansion projects in the form of "new" interlockings and additional tracks. I use the quotes as some of the interlockings are actually restorations of those that existed within living memory, but were removed for the sake of efficiency. 

Restoration of the old SG and NY interlockings.

The first phase of this work is underway at the set of the old SG interlocking west of Johnstown. The new crossovers will allow Amtrak trains to use both sides of the single island platform that serves tracks 2 and 3. Currently if track #2 is unavailable, trains must use main track #3 which follows the slower route of the old Sang Hollow Extension for 15 miles between CP-CONPIT and CP-C since SG interlocking was removed by Conrail around 1980. 

Returning 3 tracks to the Rockville Bridge

Additional changes include the restoration of CP-WEST PITT, removed by NS around 2007, a new crossover on the West Slope near the old NY interlocking between CP-SO and CP-MO, a new third main track between CP-ALTOON and CP-ANTIS, a new interlocking on the Altoona raceway between CP-ANTIS and CP-GRAY and another third main track between CP-BANKS and CP-HARRIS, which would restore a third track to the Rockville Bridge which was lost around 2000. Summary details of the project can be found here with a 2021 report providing more details of the track and interlocking changes. Note the report is not gospel as photos of the new CP-SG show parallel crossovers instead of a universal crossover.

Although no longer equipped with Conrail/PRR era signals, the NS Pittsburgh Line is still Rule 562 cab signaled with "C" lamps, so more interlockings means adding signals where automatics were previously removed.

Clear to Next Interlocking Rule 280a Displayed at CP-SOLOMON (EAST PITT)

In NORAC-aligned cab signal territory where wayside intermediate signals are not provided, Rule 280a, "Clear to Next Interlocking", allows trains without cab signals to proceed under signal indication instead of needing a track warrant or moving at Restricted speed. Related to the old concept of manual block clear, Rule 280a consists of a flashing lunar white light under the letter 'C' adjacent to a wayside controlled signal. These are normally pretty hard to catch in the wild because they are intended to be used to remedy en-route cab signal failures which are both rare and impossible to predict. For a time it was policy for Norfolk Southern dispatchers to run some Amtrak trains under absolute block protection and I was informed that some would display the  Rule 280a "C Lamp" where available, but I never managed to observe this practice for myself. 

That being said I did stumble upon a scheduled use of Rule 280a that one can catch if they are ever in the Pittsburgh area. After arriving at its Pittsburgh terminus, Amtrak Pennsylvanian Train 43 must reverse about 5 miles to CP-HOME where the closest turning wye is located. Because the rear coach lacks cab signal capability, the "C lamp" is displayed in along side the interlocking signal at CP-PITT, CP-EAST PITT (aka CP-SOLOMON), CP-BLOOM (if necessary) and depending on the order of the wye move, CP-HOME. 

Somewhat ironically the first three interlockings, CP-PITT, CP-EAST PITT and CP-BLOOM, are all back-to-back with no code change points between them. NS could have designated that track segment as normal Rule 261 without the "C" lamps, but their policy followed that of Conrail to provide the "C" even where it is not necessary. (Amtrak had chosen to do the opposite up until about 2010).

Anyway, here we see the 2E mast signal governing track #1 eastbound at CP-SOLOMON (EAST PITT) on the former Conrail Pittsburgh Line displaying Rule 280a in conjunction with a Medium Clear indication reverse move of Amtrak's westbound Pennsylvanian Train 43. CP-EAST PITT is only about half a mile from CP-BLOOM and directly adjacent to office parking making it and ideal spot to Rule 280a in the wild. 

I got this video from the east end of CP-PITT, which a shorter walk from downtown. About 30 minutes after its outbound passage, Train 43 will get more more "C" lamps displayed for a second long reverse move back into Pittsburgh Penn Station however the 2W signal at CP-PITT will display a Restricting into the station track without the "C" indication.

No Approach! The Duality of Uncommon Signals

We all learn about traffic lights in elementary school.  Red means stop, green means go and yellow means slow or caution. These are the basics of automatic block signaling that also tend to get taught in entry level railroading books. Now its pretty logical that a signal might lack the ability to display a clear indication. A permanent stop condition or the end of automatic block territory are both situations where a Clear signal would not ever apply. However there are a few situations where signals in North America can display Stop or Clear, but not Approach on the full speed head. 

The first is at interlockings outside of automatic block territory like a diamond crossing or drawbridge. The signal provides movement authority through the interlocking and without track circuits outside of the interlocking limits there is no "prepare to stop" points an Approach type signal would apply to. Trains will have their own movement authority like a track warrant so a clear signal is basically the interlocking telling the train "you do you". One might expect signals in this case to display a Restricting indication, instead of a clear, and sometimes they do, but that is going to come with a 20mph speed restriction, or less, which can be a time hit on unsignaled lines with higher track speeds. 

The next situation, Manual Block territory, would be very familiar to those in other parts of the world. Although almost extinct in the US, there remains a bit of manual block still in service on the LIRR and the way to identify a manual block signal is the lack of an approach indication. (This also applies in general to historic PRR signaling charts.) Signals will display Stop or Clear Block with any Approach functionality handled by a separate distant signal towards the end of the manual block. The PRR even went one further sometimes substituting the \ "Caution" indication in place of / Approach. 

Sometimes its really not good to have locomotives stopped and waiting at a specific signal,  Maybe there's an issue with a grade crossing, or noise, or diesel exhaust. In this case it would not be desirable for trains to approach that signal prepared to stop, so a preceding signal will either hold trains short or allow them to approach a signal with some sort of proceed indication. The most notable of these is at the entrance to Washington Union Stations 1st St tunnel that the currently diesel hauled northbound trains cannot enter without having a signal displayed further on that allows them to leave said tunnel. Another nearby signal location at CSX's LENFANT interlocking might lack southbound approach signals for a similar reason due to an overbuild.

One somewhat PRR-specific situation is where interlockings are provided with exit signals and because of the short distance between the interlocking's entrance signal and exit signal, Slow Approach is used instead of Approach. This creates an upper head that can only display --- Stop or | Clear. The C&O also made frequent use of exit signals, but seemed to keep their upper head Approach indication, although Medium Clear to exit Approach allowed the C&O to minimize the use of R/Y/Y/ Medium Clear.

A fairly new situation where Approach has been "omitted" involves high speed turnouts. At certain points on the NEC, Amtrak has decided to combine a flashing green "Cab Speed" signal indication with R/*Y* Medium Approach. At the end of a main track that converges into another via a high speed turnout, the result will be an upper head with green and red lamps/positions and no yellow lamp/position.
 

New Signals Up At THORN

 Although not much has changed regarding the ultimate fate of THORN tower, recent photos do show what the new signaling situation is going to look like. In the eastbound direction the triple signal bridge covering tracks 1, 2 and 5 Running, have gotten the Safetrain upgrade with Rule 562 'C' boards turned. Although not yet in photos, it is expected that track 4 will also be getting a PL mast signal to replace the existing reverse direction dwarf. SEPTA is tentatively resuming service to Coatesville upon the completion of new station facilities in 2025 which includes a semi-restoration of #2 track to a point just past the new station for the daily NS regional freight. 

In the westbound direction new PL masts are up on tracks 1 and 2 to replace the reverse direction dwarfs and its assumed that a new gantry mounted signal will be in store for #4 track.  The real surprise is what looked to be a new westbound full PL mast signal on what used to be the Low Grade Freight Line track. The old THORN had maintained a vestigial signal in that same location, but despite the rationalization of the former 6-track full crossover, it seems the low grade stub track has not only been retained, but is being prepared for use. What that use might be remains to be seen, but a mast capable of displaying Medium and Limited speed signals could imply SEPTA trains making some sort of switchback maneuver after discharging on Thorndale's track #4 platform or coming out of some yet to be built storage tracks on the footprint of the old PRR Thorndale facility. 

The THORN interlocking cutover is still planned for later in June with DOWNS to lose its switches before complete removal. GLEN and FRAZER will be turned over to the dispatcher by the end of 2025 closing THORN as an active interlocking station.

Harrisburg Power Office Is Now Mostly Up and Running

When we last checked in on the Harrisburg Power Director's office about a year ago in 2024, the Big Board had been fully illuminated and most of the Westinghouse "Visicode" SCADA equipment had been reactivated with the help of modern technology simulating the presence of the field equipment like substations and such. However, because the 1930's PRR electrification projects had been funded with depression era WPA loans, the PRR had to spread the wealth and about half the office used GE "Code Selector" hardware that was more complex in operation and not as well documented. 

Well between March and September 2024, members of the Harrisburg Chapter NRHS managed to locate the documentation for the GE gear (it was sitting on a storage shelf) and were then able to restore most of the GE panels to operation, which is especially useful that represents the bulk of what was still operational on the old PRR Main Line up through 2013. The GE gear brings the added fun of step switches being used to store digits instead of all-relay registers for the Westinghouse part of the office.

As if step-switches weren't enough, between September 2024 and March 2025, the team also reconnected the alarm lamps and bell which further adds to the effect.

Still to be addressed are the metering circuits along with programmed simulation elements that would allow visitors to participate in directing flows of 25hz power to virtual train movements. Still, the Harrisburg power office  is mostly complete in terms of being "a thing that functions as it once did" so watch out for planned opening dates as the chapter is still trying to figure out how to manage regular hours.

DOCK Movable Bridge to Become DOCK Bridge

In 2017 the great DOCK tower closed as a staffed interlocking station after about 80 years of service. However the imposing structure retained one last official duty beyond "employee lounge" and that was housing the controls and auxiliary equipment to work the adjacent three span vertical lift drawbridge situated between the tower and Newark Penn Station.

 

Unfortunately the Passiac River was not the industrial thoroughfare of years past and unlike the nearby PORTAL bridge whose low clearance made it subject to periodic openings for barge traffic, the height of the DOCK draws is sufficient for the dwindling commercial traffic on the waterway.  After not opening a single time in 2024, Amtrak has petitioned the Coast Guard for permission to permanently close the bridge.

While it is unlikely that anything will happen to the bridge, Amtrak will no longer have to maintain the operating equipment, interlocking logic and the mechanisms used to make and break rail and overhead wire continuity.

DOCK draw actually contains three independent movable bridge spans. A large 3-track north span for mostly westbound Amtrak and NJT trains, a 2 track span for PATH rapid transit trains and a single track span for mostly eastbound Amtrak and NJT trains. The PATH span was set at a higher clearance above the river to reduce the number of openings on what was higher frequency rapid transit line.

 

One interesting quirk was the use of standard point machines to work the rail locking mechanisms at least on the PATH tracks. 

Based on the general interlocking layout I would not expect many signals to move, although the eastbound signals on tracks 2 and 3 might be moved across the bridge to resolve possible ACSES positive stop issues.

The fate of the control equipment on the operator's level and the auxiliary equipment, like AC-DC motor-generators, on the cavernous ground floor remains to be seen, however the safe option would be to leave it in place just in case. Numerous lift bridge have been converted to a fixed status with the counterweights left to dangle for many decades with little thought.

The petition requires a 120 day trial period of being "closed" at which point it will be approved or denied. After that there would be no set timeline for Amtrak to make changes so if a signal move looks likely I'll keep you informed.

THORN Tower's Last Act

Amtrak's THORN tower has been staffed 24/7 and routing trains on the former Pennsylvania Railroad Main Line since 1938, however after having gone on a rather extensive diet in recent years, THORN tower appears to be entering its last act. However its not going without a few strange twists.

As a CTC era tower with both local and remote relay based interlockings, THORN presents a fairly easy case for remote control, as was the case with THORN's sister tower COLA back in 1987. Already Amtrak has chipped away at THORN's territory, re-signaling CALN interlocking and transfering control to the Section C dispatcher in 2020.  Now it appears that the plan is to re-signal and transfer control of the local THORN interlocking in the middle of 2025.  

While this would typically mean the closing of THORN tower itself, the news is that the tower will continue in service controlling GLEN interlocking via the 1938 CTC machine and FRAZER interlocking on the 1994 vintage unit lever panel. Much of THORN's work involves FRAZER interlocking as that is where SEPTA trains for the busy R5 Paoli/Thorndale service lay over.

Plans also include the removal of DOWNS interlocking with deadhead movements continuing on to THORN. For years track #2 between THORN and GLEN had been in terrible shape with Amtrak operators and dispatchers looking for ways to avoid using it.  However it has been recently rehabilitated and train managers are looking to make better use of the asset. 

With these changes I would expect to see "C" boards for Rule 562 operation on both sides of THORN and if DOWNS is removed it is possible that cab signal only operation will extend all the way to FRAZER (track #1) and GLEN (track #4). Whatever happens, I'll keep everyone informed.

PHOTOS: Amtrak CORK Tower

 A while ago I posted the first part of my coverage of the Pennsylvania Railroad's 1929 CORK interlocking tower in Lancaster, PA which covered the tower's history and the layout of the interlocking on the PRR's Main Line. Today we cover the tower itself, heading inside to see how it functioned in both its pre and post re-signaling phases. The exterior photos date from 2005 when the interlocking complex was in the process of being resignaled. 

To recap, CORK interlocking and tower were constructed as part of the 1929 Lancaster station project which moved Lancaster's busy passenger depot away from a downtown alignment with slow speeds, lots of grade crossings and partial street running. The resulting interlocking plant spanned approximately 3.3 miles of main line track, which was an outlier for early 20th century direct wire controlled interlockings in North America. Like the contemporary Lancaster station. CORK was built of a dark brick and featured a prominent bay window sheathed in copper cladding. 

 

 

The tower had one auxiliary building that housed the primary compressed air plant and was situated on the south side of the tracks in line with the extreme west ends of the high level station platforms. The tower had an internal staircase with the shelf type relay room on the first floor. With its brick construction and slate roof, the tower was in excellent physical shape as it entered the 21st century. 

 

Heading inside the tower we find a typical layout with the operator's desk sitting in front of the US&S Model 14 interlocking machine. A defect detector readout and overhead catenary section breaker control panel are to the operator's right with the lockers, clock and old telecom plugboard sitting to the left. One interesting feature is that the room has retained its original 1929 vintage overhead lamp fixtures. 

The operator's space is feels like a more cramped version of HARRIS tower with less space around the interlocking machine on all four sides. The gap between the scoreboard style model board and the rear aligned internal staircase is particularly small. As with other PRR Main Line towers, lever blocking devices are stored on top of the interlocking machine and the bathroom is in the left rear corner. Also note the location of the refrigerator, notice board and train order hoops. 

The sprawling CORK interlocking plant was controlled by a relatively modest 67 lever interlocking machine with 49 active levers in its 1960's configuration consisting of 23 levers for switches, 23 levers for signals, 2 levers for electric switch locks and 1 crossing lever for the Reading's Lancaster Branch diamond crossing. The plant was divided into three timer zones, A, B and C with the A timer handling the Conestoga section, the B timer the central Cork plant and the C timer the Reading crossing. The short run was 1 minute with the long run being about 5 minutes and 30 seconds. The tower also had 4 horns for Conestoga, the tower itself, Lancaster West, Dillersville yard and the Reading crossing (Longs Park).

One interesting feature was the presence of Rusty Rail tabs instead of the more usual placard. Besides that the levers were of the standard US&S crank type.

Although CORK's model board was a standard PRR illuminated type, it had several interesting features features. Grade crossing status lights were located at either end of the board to indicate the activation status of the Irishtown Road (east) or Eby Chiques (west) crossings. There were three low air alarms for East and West Conestoga in addition to the Cork main plant. In the post-1960 era two block indication lamps were added for tracks 1 and 4 eastbound. These had some interaction with PARK tower to the east as well as the intervening temporary block station at LEAMAN with track #1 being lit by the regular 2 lever and track #4 by a button on the operator's desk console. Best I can tell this was some technical method to prevent conflicting movements beyond what would be afforded by train orders and the dispatcher. Finally the most endearing model board feature was a framed photo of CORK tower itself that is also present in photos from c. 1992.

 

More Connecticut River Corridor News

 Although my last update on the Connecticut Valley Corridor was only back in March, I have some additional updates from a follow up trip in October. The most significant are alterations to SPRING interlocking in Springfield, MA. The root cause for altering SPRING is to create an interlocked connection between Boston Line Track 2A and the Amtrak Springfield Line trackage. This route was previously used by the old Vermonter and Inland Route Regionals and required the use of hand throw switches to the east of the station. Without a connection at SPRING, Track 2A is only purpose is to serve as an emergency berth for the daily Lake Shore Limited round trip. The new switch allows Track 2A to be used for both CT Rail Hartford Line trains and Amtrak Springfield Shuttles and also creates additional storage space for increased CT Rail or Regional service. 

Of course there always has to be a downside and unfortunately the changes at SPRING will also cause the elimination of what is arguably the last vintage signal on the Amtrak Springfield Line.  Station track #8 is still governed by a US&S N-2 dwarf, possibly dating back to the New Haven era.  Moreover station track #6 is governed by an uncommon US&S modular dwarf stack that was installed in the early-2000's to replace an H-5 searchlight.  Both will be replaced by Safetran modular cube dwarfs that infected the Springfield line back in 2004.

The bad news doesn't stop there as the New Englande Central re-signaling project continues unabated. It currently appears that new standard sized ABS blocks are in service between Walpole and Claremont, replacing the old B&M large block CTC. This also implies that the new signaling at Claremont has been activated. New interlocking huts have been dropped at both the south end of the Walpole siding and the Bellows Falls diamond. At the north end of the Walpole siding the new interlocking retained the southbound searchlight mast, so it remains to be see if there are any searchlit survivors in the Bellows Falls area. I unfortunately neglected to inspect the controlled point south of Bellows Falls, but it is on my list for a visit in the Spring.

Decision 2024 for the Signaling Single Issue Voter

Just like in 2020 I thought I'd provide some political analysis for the single issue railroad signaling single issue voter. Not sure who that would be exactly, but in a country this big it has to be somebody. In 2020 the big political signaling issue was PTC and the Trump administration's general failure to soften the regulations or roll it back before PTC driven signal replacement projects ruined the legacy infrastructure. In 2024 PTC is still proving to be a problem in terms of ETMS outages cancelling passenger services, but I don't see either party lifting a finger to solve the problem and almost all the vintage signaling is gone anyway.

In terms of regulation in general fears that the East Palestine derailment would trigger a moral panic on the order of the 2008 Chatsworth crash proved to be unfounded and I have to give the Biden administration real credit for taking a political risk and not rushing through knee jerk regulations that would damage the rail industry. We might see a minimum distance between hotbox detectors well below the old 20 mile AAR standard, but several railroads like the Southern and N&W have been on shorter intervals for decades.

Of course one area where I would call regulations too weak was the FRA's decision to allow CSX to remove the cab signal system on the RF&P. Coded track circuits are still more reliable and secure than over the air data links running off internet connected servers and attempts to use ETMS as safety critical cab signaling is going to cause a bad day. Another regulatory issue that is also in also in the blind spot of both parties is the FRA's use of shadow regulations to throttle the deployment of higher (80+ mph) speed passenger rail service. This might find a sympathetic ear on the current supreme court, but since it doesn't affect Class 1 freight RR's industry is uninterested in mounting a challenge and passenger operators known they are beholden to public funding.

A major factor in favor current Democratic politics the focus on anti-trust and industrial consolidation. Today the biggest threat to interesting signaling is industry consolidation, as seen with CSX's snapping up Guilford and CP buying KCS. I would expect proposed east-west RR mergers, like BNCSFX or UPNS, not passing regulatory muster under a Harris administration. In terms of trade policy, the vast majority of signaling equipment is still produced domestically so tariffs aren't necessary to fight off some invasion of cheap Chinese signaling hardware because that threat simply doesn't exist.

Finally, because legacy signaling has been so thoroughly decimated, the only way forward is new rail projects, which is one of Biden's signature issues. While a lot of the projects that have been built have employed locally prevailing signal rules and styles, there is always the chance of a Caltrain style speed signaling conversion or expansion of the Northeast cab signal network. 

Therefore if you are looking for my opinion I would endorse the Democratic ticket primarily for blocking additional rail mergers and funding the construction of new signaled passenger routes. They have earned my trust on avoiding bad regulation and are no worse than the alternative in cleaning up the FRA's existing over-regulation.

New Signals at Portland Union Station

For the last year or more, Portland (Oregon) Union Station has been involved in a slow motion re-signaling project that will unfortunately zap the last active vestiges of VC Tower, which closed in 1996 as Oregon's last active interlocking station. 

Until labor dynamic forced a change in the early 2000's it was not uncommon for railroads to splice old interlocking hardware, like switches and signals, into new control logic. VC was one such example where the eastbound signals were left untouched. 

These included a short mast signal off of passenger track #1 with a mix of GRS type E and L&W modular lamps, a modernized GRS type MF triangular dwarf, (popular with UP in the 80's and 90's) off main track #4 and two vintage GRS type MD dwarfs on track #3 and #5 that likely date back to whenever VC tower changed over from semaphore signals. 

The replacement will be an obtrusive double cantilever mast for tracks 3, 4 and 5 and a likely modern type mast on track #1. 

The current two lamp dwarf signals appear to consist of a red lamp over a yellow lamp, which would provide for Y Approach, R/Y Diverging Approach and *R* Restricting, although was not able to observe actual operations. The new signals seem to bring Y/Y Approach Diverging to the table. 

The changes aren't limited to the east side of the terminal. For some time passenger tracks 1 through 4 have been un-signaled with the west end of of those tracks being reached via non-interlocked M23 powered switches. Based on bagged station track signals and a bagged through track mast it appears the west end will also be interlocked, including the presently hand throw station track #1.

This will hopefully cut a couple of minutes off the run time, with trains possibly able to make hotter stops, instead of creeping down the super long platforms.