Search This Blog

Saturday, August 8, 2020

Former Conrail Boston Line Completes Cab Signal Conversion

Sometime over the winter of 2019/20 the MBTA cut in the last section of Rule 562 cab signal without fixed wayside signal territory on the former Conrail Boston Line between the Amtrak division post at COVE and CP-21 in Framingham.  This completes the cab signal conversion project that was imitated by Conrail in 1988 and carried out in three distinct phases over the following 32 years.
Rule 280a 'C' boards are up at CP-3 (Photo Credit Fred G.)
In 1988 the Conrail Boston Line, originally built as the NY Central affiliated Boston and Albany (B&A), was showing its age.  The two track, Rule 251 ABS signaled line was an expensive albatross in post-industrial New Englande. Seizing the opportunity, Conrail decided to rebuild the line and in the process set a new standard that continues on to this day, most notably under under NS.  At the time the state of the art for a Rule 251 ABS conversion was a mix of CTC and single tracking.  Conrail decided to take this one step further and installed cab signaling without fixed wayside signals to compliment the adoption of CTC and single tracking on most of the B&A's 200 mile long main line. 

CP-147 with Conrail standard target signals and legacy SA searchlights now serving as Clear to Next Interlocking lamps.

The first part of this rebuild stretched from CP-187 at the Post Road Branch junction to CP-33, midway between Framingham and Worcester.  While this system had been tested on the PRR's Conemaugh Line in 1948, the Boston Line project would mark the first use of cab signal only operation by a post-deregulation freight railroad.  More surprising is how the former B&A was well away from Conrail's existing cab signal territory on former PRR routes and signaled a commitment. by Conrail, to deploy cab signaling as standard equipment on its full fleet of road freights.  Conrail would later repeat the cab signal rebuild process on the Morrisville, Fort Wayne and Cleveland lines before the 1999 sale and breakup halted further expansion of cab signal territory. The project also involved the use of color tri-light signals, a departure from the small target Michigan Central style searchlights Conrail had briefly favored during the 1980's.  The color tri-lights would remain Conrail's default signal up to the 1999 sale and beyond via the Shares Assets Operations. 

Clear to Next Interlocking lamps at CP-21 turned to await a cab signal extension that would take 22 years to complete.
Halting the cab signals at CP-33 in 1988 allowed the MBTA commuter operation that ran between Boston South Station and Framingham to avoid having to cab signal equip whichever trainsets that on the line.  Conrail did eliminate the remaining single direction ABS between CP-33 and COVE and also preserved the line as fully double track.  Nine years later, the MBTA was expanding and the Rule 562 cab signal equipped Old Colony lines would generally eliminate the desirability for non-cab signal equipped trainsets running out of South Station.   In 1996 the second track was restored between CP-33 and CP-43 east of Worcester with the decision being made to extend the cab signals through to CP-21 Framingham.  While 'C' lamps were installed on the eastbound masts at CP-21, they were turned out of service as the recently upgraded CTC signaling between there and COVE was seen as not worth replacing.

New signals at the new CP-6
 In 1999 CSX purchased 48% of Conrail including the Boston Line, which quickly became an operational headache as CSX did not otherwise employ cab signaling except for the former Richmond, Fredericksburg and Potomac.  As CSX owned the line all the way to the Amtrak division post at COVE in order to serve the Beacon Park yard and intermodal terminal and has little interest in commuter operations, service on the MBTA Framingham/Worcester Line began to suffer.  In 2011 the state on Massachusetts offered to purchase the line and yard real estate east of CP-45 in exchange for land in Worcester for a new CSX intermodal facility.  This would allow the MBTA to improve both service and the physical plant with the first major project being the elimination of a single track bottleneck that existed between CP-3 and CP-4 to support the former yard.  By 2017 this project grew to encompass a new full crossover interlocking (CP-6) and, the extension of the Rule 562 cab signaling all the way to COVE.

Milepost 6 intermediate signals..

Milepost 7 intermediate signals.

Milepost 8 intermediate signals.

Milepost 10 intermediate signals.

 This unfortunately has meant the elimination of 4, bi-directional searchlight automatic signal locations.  Each of these 16 signals were equipped with two heads per mast to support a 4 block signaling arrangement that was necessitated by the short, 1.4 mile signal blocks between CP-11 and COVE.



Milepost 2 intermediate signals.
A further automatic signal location at milepost 2 had been replaced in the late 1990's by Conrail color lights.  I actually remember seeing a brand new Conrail SD80MAC approaching the searchlights as I drove past on the MassPike in the 1997 time frame.

Milepost 16 intermediate signals.

Milepost 18 intermediate signals.
Between CP-11 and CP-21 there are only three signal locations, all installed as part of the 1988 upgrade project, that were eliminated.  These use the same Harmon supplied target style color light signals that were installed elsewhere on the line.

(Photo Credit Fred G's drone)
Shockingly, the old searchlight signals at CP-3 have not only been retained, but upgraded as well with side mounted 'C' lamps to display Rule 280a, Clear to Next Interlocking, indications. I have also been informed that the same process was applied to the searchlight masts at CP-11 located just past the I-95 beltway.


In summary we lost 4 double double double searchlight locations and 4 Conrail tri-light locations, but two searchlight interlockings got a service life extension.

8 comments:

  1. The Michigan Line, like the Boston line has a similar history of upgrading just as your blog post describes, I really enjoy reading the history here! The MICL was 251 ABS and broken into ABS/CTC. The new intermediates were all retired signals from an eastern line (I forget if it was the Boston or Hudson Lines though). All interlockings were tri-light style from various manufacturers.

    My question, if you know the answer, is in regard to the short block section and four-block signaling. NYC used Y/R Approach, Y/Y Advance Approach and then G/G Clear to create four blocks. What was employed here? The MICL on a stretch of track going downgrade used Approach Medium indications into an approach. When Amtrak redid the signal system 5-6 years ago it went away, but I thought it was really cool.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Under NORAC one is more likely to get Clear -> Approach Medium -> Approach -> Stop than Clear -> Advance Approach -> Approach -> Stop, but both are perfectly valid. The former gives a bit more flexibility in non-cab signal territory.

      On the Boston Line segment in question I would have said Approach Medium is used as the lower heads are a giveaway. However, I have a head end video of that part of the line and while I see 81E Clear to 71E Approach Medium to 61E Approach to CP-4 Stop on the "floating" track 1, the routed train on track 2 gets 72E Clear, 62E Y/Y Approach Slow(!) to CP-4 Approach and every other signal was Approach into South Station. The engineer actually notes that the Approach Slow was "odd" and has "been that way for years". What I think we are seeing is a leftover Y/Y NY Central style Advance Approach for a Stop at CP-3, however it was never changed.

      From the video it looks like 62E was Approach, not Approach Slow, both both the engineer and observer say it was Approach Slow so its a mystery.

      Delete
  2. There actually is one set of searchlight automatics left on CSX, and it's in a place you might not think of.

    The CSX Carman branch has one set of intermediate signals left. the 18E/18W pair. You can see a RARE view of them in this video.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ABZwkcTZig

    The Carman branch is an oddball remnant. It is Rule 261 with CSS. The only trains that use it are locals that access West Albany yard, the area around the Amtrak station, and the Troy industrial.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Son of a bitch! I always thought the Carman Branch was a single block. For years I had been staying over at a friend's grandmother's house every year for ski trips and such and that signal is 1.2 miles from her house. I made my friend drive me all over to document various signals and I completely missed the easiest one.

      Unfortunately the grandmother passed away this February :-(

      Delete
    2. Best thing to do are to look at the old Conrail track charts.
      http://www.multimodalways.org/docs/railroads/companies/CR/CR%20Track%20Charts/CR%20Albany%20Track%20Chart%201999.pdf

      Which reminded me. There might be 3 other pairs left. But I have NO clue how your going to access any of them.

      The CSX Shodack Branch (Under CR it was park of the Selkirk Branch) from CP-SM to CP-125 has or had three intermediates on it. 3E/W 5E/W and 7E/W. I have NO clue how anyone would get up on that hillside to see them however. Line is low traffic. Only the Hudson line freights use it.

      I checked the Post Road Branch too and it is a single block, one LONG single block

      Delete
    3. Shodack Branch now has a single darth intermediate that I saw on the Amtrak fall train.

      Post Road branch uses Conrail era target color lights. Probably about 2-3 blocks.

      The signal information on the track charts isn't reliable or kept up to date.

      Delete
  3. Mike - a correction to your statement about "CSX owned the line all the way to the Amtrak division post at COVE". The portion of the line east of CP11 was purchased from the NYC in the early 1960s by the MA Turnpike Authority so they could use the 4-track wide right of way for the turnpike extension. The railroad was granted a non-revocable easement for railroad operations, but that portion of the line was state-owned (and, I believe state-maintained) long before Conrail or CSX even existed. The portion between CP21 and CP11 was sold by Penn Central to the state (MBTA this time) in 1973, so any extension of cab signalling or replacement of signal systems would have needed state permission (and funding) to happen. Conrail only owned up to CP21, so no further extension of the cab signal system could happen without the state agreeing to it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I should have probably said controlled or maintained. Sort of like how the Shore Line is owned by the states, but mantained, controlled, dispatched and upgraded by Amtrak. I don't know what the the agreement with Conrail was, but I suspect Conrail had to maintain everything. If the state would "own" the improved signals that would make it unlikely for Conrail to want to "improve" them for free, however the left mounted signals between CP-11 and CP-4 had to have been installed after the regulation changed around 1985, so they simply may not have needed improvement like the ABS 251 west of CP-33.

      Also until 1997 the 562 ran up to CP-33, not CP-21.

      Delete