Search This Blog

Saturday, July 14, 2018

Caught on Camera: Clear to Next Interlocking

Also known as NOARC Rule 280a, this special cab signal related signal was invented by the Pennsylvania Railroad for their experimental trial of cab signals without fixed automatic signals (today known as Rule 562) on the Conemaugh Line between CP-CONPIT and CP-KISKI back in the late 1940's or early 1950's.  Without wayside intermediate signals, trains that experience a cab signal failure en route would not be able to proceed without absolute block protection ahead.  Normally this would involve train orders (or today a track warrant/Form D) however the reliability focused PRR decided to automate the potentially delay inducing procedure with a special signal that would illuminate when the track was clear to the next interlocking where the next wayside signal would be located.


 One option could have been to simply display a Rule 280 "Clear Block" signal, which was an upper head | with a single marker below and used in manual block territory.  However because of the lack of manual block distant signals and because of the non-lack of train detection, a new Rule 280a was created, "Clear to Next Interlocking" and it would consist of a flashing lunar white market offset to the side and labeled with a reflective 'C'.  Any diverging movements through the first interlocking would be covered by the fixed signal and trains would be instructed to approach the next interlocking prepared to stop.  Here we can see an example of a Rule 280a being displayed along side an Approach signal at Amtrak's REA interlocking.



As you can see, the 'C' lamp is displayed independently if absolute block conditions are met.  On unit lever and VDU interfaces the 'C' lamp is a separate switch associated with each signal.  While technically unnecessary at back-to-back interlockings, 'C' boards are more often deployed uniformly so crews do not loose track of which signals they can pass with failed cab signals. In this more elaborate demonstration of signal progressions at Amtrak's HUDSON interlocking we can see how the 'C' lamp is placed on the fame flashing circuit as other flashing signals such as Cab Speed and Approach Limited.



Finally, we actually have an example of a display 'C' signal in the wild.  This was at the re-signaled STELL interlocking for a southbound movement against the flow of traffic on the NS Enola Branch.  NS has decided to employ waysideless operation on much of it's cab signaled PRR territory, following in the footsteps of Conrail in the 1990's.  Previously the Enola Branch had been run under single direction Rule 251, but when the line was re-signaled, the Rule 562 operation saved a bit of money on intermediate signals.  First note the NS style backings on the 'C' boards, a practice not carried forward to subsequent projects. Second this is an interesting occurrence as a train with failed cabs could in theory be swapped out at Enola yard and finally note the slower flashing cadence compared with the Amtrak signals.



That's it for this episode of Caught on Camera. Nothing is scheduled for the next time cause I won't know it until I catch it ;-)

5 comments:

  1. Have you ever seen its distant counterpart, 280b - Approach Normal? A quick YouTube search shows no readily apparent videos of it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They were only used briefly by Metro North on the New Haven Line in the 1980's and installed, but not activated by Amtrak on the Shore Line. It's a good deal of cost for almost no advantage. The train basically gets to skip the whole approach prepared to stop thing.

      Delete
    2. Interesting, I guess once in a rulebook, always in a rulebook if there's no big reason to rip it out. I appreciate the info!

      Delete
  2. Thanks for the post! I've got a few questions about Clear to Next Interlocking that I'm hoping you will entertain.

    1. Suppose there is an interlocking 'Anna' capable of showing the 'C' lamp, and there are five intermediate blocks (but no wayside signals) between Anna and the next interlocking, Bess. Further suppose there is an open hand-throw switch in the fifth block (the last before Bess). If I understand correctly, in this situation it would be possible for the signal at Anna to display Clear, but it would not be possible for it to display the 'C' lamp. Is that correct?

    2. Can the 'C' lamp ever be displayed at an interlocking signal showing Stop Signal (because a lineup has not been requested by the dispatcher) even though absolute block conditions are met beyond the signal? I'm guessing the circuitry is set to not display the 'C' lamp in this situation.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 1. "Clear" to next interlocking is not a manual block style procedural clear. The track is proved clear via track circuits and other devices such as switch position detectors, slide fences, etc.

      2. While I am sure one could concoct a situation where Rule 280a could display along side a Stop signal, a Stop signal generally means no route has been established through the interlocking and establishing a route is a requirement to display Rule 280a. It is possible that a Restricting or Stop and Proceed could be displayed along side 280a. In that case the Restricted speed would apply only within the interlocking limits.

      Delete