Amtrak's New Position Light Configuration

Following from Pennsylvania railroad practices, Amtrak used the following two configurations for all of its "complete" position color light mast signals at interlockings. They either have a lunar white Restricting \, or they don't. In both cases the single central lunar white Stop and Proceed marker has been retained.  

While most other North American railroads have shifted to using Restricted Proceed in place of Stop and Proceed, Amtrak, and the NORAC rulebook for whom Amtrak is the biggest member, have both retained the Stop and Proceed practice.  

So consider my surprise when saw the recently installed colorized position light signals at Amtrak's new LEGGETT interlocking on the Hellgate Line. The restricting \ is present, but, please correct me if I am wrong, I believe this is the first time I have seen Amtrak PL interlocking signals without a Stop and Proceed marker. 
 

Part of  the Penn Station Access Project, these colorized position lights are the first of many that will wipe out the last stretch of amber position lights on the NEC (PHIL is a point, not a stretch) and they appear to indicate a shift at Amtrak towards that all important stop before entering an occupied block.

In case your wondering the typical Amtrak signal progression is to display a Stop and Proceed if there is an obstruction within the interlocking limits and a Restricting (if available) if the interlocking is clear, but the block beyond is not. The stop certainly seems like a worthwhile safety precaution, but the distinction between it and Restricted proceed is minimal, mostly just the salience of entering a stretch of track with an obstruction or broken rail. 
 

As you can see the new signals on the replacement Portal Bridge have retained the Stop and Proceed marker, but that project was designed and specified some years before Penn Station Access. So it remains to be seen if this is the shape of things to come, or a one off trial. 

 

 

Signals of the Reading and Northern Lehigh Line

Pennsylvania's Wyoming Valley, today home to the Scranton–Wilkes-Barre metropolitan area, was the West Texas or Saudi Arabia of the 19th century due to its massive reserves of Anthracite coal. A premium product demanding premium prices, anthracite coal was the way that industrializing America kept warm in the water months after the landscape had been stripped bare of trees for firewood. This is how the Wyoming Valley could fund the operations of three major railroads (the Lehigh Valley, Central RR of NJ and Delaware Lackawanna and Western) and similarly explain why those railroads seemed to evaporate without a trace when the world moved on to oil and natural gas.

Perhaps nothing optimized the uniquely American phenomena of direct railroad competition like the LVRR and CNJ, whose main lines were both functionally and in some places literally parallel. In the 1960's the anthracite collapse was well under way and a decade before Conrail, the CNJ had decided to throw in the towel and allow the LVRR to consolidate its operations to Scranton. North of its large yard in Lehighton, PA, the LVRR was able to stitch together a hybrid route, using better aligned portions of the CNJ over the Pocono mountain summit between White Haven and Laurel Run. Later, Conrail would choose to use the CNJ main line between Lehighton and Allentown creating a Frankenstein's monster "Lehigh Line" between NYC, Scranton and NY's Southern Tier. As the region's industry continued to shift, Conrail shoveled off the Lehigh Line north of Lehighton to the upstart Reading and Northern in the 1990's.

All this history is necessary to understand why the signaling on the Lehigh Line portion of the Reading and Northern's main line between Reading and Pittston, looks the way it does. Recently made visible by the series of R&N Iron Horse Rambles and its regular weekend Lehigh Gorge excursion service, the current signaling on the upper Lehigh Line reflect its unique history. In the 2024/2025 time frame I was able to gather enough content to put together a signaling guide covering the old Lehigh Line between Mauch Chunk and Pittston.

We begin at R&N's COAL interlocking, which was built new by them to support the R&N's "Main Line" concept between Reading and Pittston, but also its Lehigh Gorge tourist operations. Using a salvaged lattice cantilever mast, COAL connects what was the old CNJ route to the former LVRR route at the south end of the Lehigh Gorge.

Into the 2000's, Conrail (later NS) owned and operated this portion of the Lehigh Line as a double track Rule 251 main line. Traffic was so light that the southbound track was used bi-directionally with northbound trains needing to get a Form D, while the southbound track had its signal system taken out of service and used for R&M excursions and freights. NS moved first to convert the southbound track to Rule 261 (CTC) operation, with the R&N converting the former northbound track to Rule 261 in the late 2010's. Each track has a single ABS signal location in this line segment, NS at LVRR milepost 126 and the R&N's at its own milepost 124.

A quick note on Mileposts. In the Conrail era the Lehigh Line would alternately use legacy mileposts from the CNJ, LVRR and LVRR Mountain Cutoff. The Reading and Northern switched this to its own mileposts that continues the Reading Company chaining from the old Reading Terminal.  Somehow this has managed to match up with the legacy CNJ mileposts within a few tenths, but LVRR mileposts are off by several miles. I will be using the R&N mileposts for most of this article.
 

CP-M&H JCT marked the transition between double track ABS and single track CTC through the Lehigh Gorge and, starting in the 1990's, the start of the Reading and Northern lease. CP-M&H JCT was re-signaled by Conrail around the time of the lease and has the typical Conrail hallmarks of a CorTen steel relay hut and color tri-light signals. What sets CP-M&H JCT apart is the use of "budget" L&W brand modular signals in the tri-lights. It's entirely possible that the lease arrangement had Conrail responsible for some portion of the signaling system (the interlockings still appear in CR's 1997 signal charts) resulting in signaling that looked Conrail, but with different hardware.

When the R&N lease came into force the arrangement still created a gap in the R&N's conceptual Main Line between Mauch Chunk and CP-M&H JCT where they had to run under Conrail rules and dispatching. When NS finally transferred the northbound track to the R&N in the mid-2000's, they were so thrilled to be in total control that they built a new interlocking back-to-back with CP-M&H JCT named INDEPENDENCE.

The mast is for CP-M&H JCT and the dwarf for INDEPENDENCE.

CP-M&H JCT wasn't an isolated re-signaling as it appears that all of the signaling in the Lehigh Gorge proper was replaced around the time of the lease. This was possibly due to the desire to replace any pole line based system due to the inaccessible nature of the right of way in the Lehigh  Gorge. The new Conrail style signaling again reflected the economic decline of the region with a shift to extra long 3-4 mile signal blocks versus the standard 1-2 mile length. ABS signal locations in the gorge are at R&N milepost 130, 133/134 and 138. The 133/134 location split the Jeddo tunnel for visibility reasons.

134S from behind

It appears that the pole line was retained to supply 440v power to the signal locations, however it is unclear if this supply is still in service.

The end of the 90's re-signaling is at the controlled holdout signal CP-WHITE-HAVEN, which is just a few miles shy of the alignment change from LVRR to CNJ. I do not currently know the status of the CNJ main north of Lehighton prior to 1965, but the re-signaling boundary is surely related to the relative utility of the CNJ signaling versus the LVRR signaling. One possibility could be a post-war investment in CTC by the CNJ to cut costs that exceeded the standard of whatever the LVRR was up to at the same time. 

Caltrain EMU Cab Video Signal Survey

After the loss of the Caltrain gallery car railfan window I wasn't holding out much hope for having anything worthwhile to do on the Caltrain system as European spec rolling stock typically come with bulkhead style cab doors. However videos have been appearing showing that front facing views are present. This have the added benefit of providing a southbound signaling survey as previously such photos and videos were only possible facing northbound. 

I have already covered changes between San Jose and Tamien and can now confirm that the remaining Southern Pacific style signals in the terminal area have been replaced. The good news is that the few SP target type signals on the north end near the tunnels are still in place although unfortunately the triple unilens stacks at CP-COMMON were replaced by a standard LED modular type in a three virtual head configuration. Another note is how bad the sight lines for some of the wayside mast signals have become. This makes clear the advantage for position lights and cab signals in electrified territory. Although the freight spec PTC system Caltrain uses is kinda like a cab signal, moving to a Rule 562 coded track circuit arrangement might save them a lot of trouble. 

You can watch the video for yourself, but despite the hype the weekend and daytime local service is still highly underwhelming with little in the way of interesting signaling or routing. Although faster than diesel, the speeds are still slow compared to a limited stop run and unfortunately these have been largely curtailed with the fastest peak period trains still 3 or 4 minutes slower than the famed 4 or 5 stop Baby Bullets of the 2004-2024 time period.

Clear to Next Interlocking Rule 280a Displayed at CP-SOLOMON (EAST PITT)

In NORAC-aligned cab signal territory where wayside intermediate signals are not provided, Rule 280a, "Clear to Next Interlocking", allows trains without cab signals to proceed under signal indication instead of needing a track warrant or moving at Restricted speed. Related to the old concept of manual block clear, Rule 280a consists of a flashing lunar white light under the letter 'C' adjacent to a wayside controlled signal. These are normally pretty hard to catch in the wild because they are intended to be used to remedy en-route cab signal failures which are both rare and impossible to predict. For a time it was policy for Norfolk Southern dispatchers to run some Amtrak trains under absolute block protection and I was informed that some would display the  Rule 280a "C Lamp" where available, but I never managed to observe this practice for myself. 

That being said I did stumble upon a scheduled use of Rule 280a that one can catch if they are ever in the Pittsburgh area. After arriving at its Pittsburgh terminus, Amtrak Pennsylvanian Train 43 must reverse about 5 miles to CP-HOME where the closest turning wye is located. Because the rear coach lacks cab signal capability, the "C lamp" is displayed in along side the interlocking signal at CP-PITT, CP-EAST PITT (aka CP-SOLOMON), CP-BLOOM (if necessary) and depending on the order of the wye move, CP-HOME. 

Somewhat ironically the first three interlockings, CP-PITT, CP-EAST PITT and CP-BLOOM, are all back-to-back with no code change points between them. NS could have designated that track segment as normal Rule 261 without the "C" lamps, but their policy followed that of Conrail to provide the "C" even where it is not necessary. (Amtrak had chosen to do the opposite up until about 2010).

Anyway, here we see the 2E mast signal governing track #1 eastbound at CP-SOLOMON (EAST PITT) on the former Conrail Pittsburgh Line displaying Rule 280a in conjunction with a Medium Clear indication reverse move of Amtrak's westbound Pennsylvanian Train 43. CP-EAST PITT is only about half a mile from CP-BLOOM and directly adjacent to office parking making it and ideal spot to Rule 280a in the wild. 

I got this video from the east end of CP-PITT, which a shorter walk from downtown. About 30 minutes after its outbound passage, Train 43 will get more more "C" lamps displayed for a second long reverse move back into Pittsburgh Penn Station however the 2W signal at CP-PITT will display a Restricting into the station track without the "C" indication.

Open Railway Map's Signaling Layer is Hot Garbage

Open Railway Map (ORM) is a great resource that recently came on the scene to allow for fast identification and tracing of railway lines, rights of way and even individual tracks. Unfortunately as project that is based in Continental Europe, its coverage of North America (and the British Isles) has some serious shortcomings, especially when it comes to signaling and train protection systems. The information is incomplete and the presentation is seriously lacking. Ironically we have already seen a better way to present this sort of information in multiple railroad-produced employee timetables. 

In Europe almost all railway lines are considered signaled, with the specific method of block working, (ie manual, automatic, token, bi-directional, etc) not being as important as it is in North America. As a result the signaling layer mostly documents special train protection systems like ETCS, TVM420, LZB, etc. (Even then a lot of "National" ATS-like systems like AWS and Le Crocodile do not make an appearance, although PZB does.) 

 

When translated to North America the result is a generic tag for "PTC" and another for "ATC", even though neither labels refer to specific train protection systems as is the case on the European overlays. One might say the project got a little in over its head trying to color code every protection system, although they do have 40 color codes for speeds. The maps cannot seem to handle situations where multiple gauges, electrification systems or train protection systems are present on the same track segment.

The solution, at least for the North American segment, is to first dump the generic "PTC" and replace it with ETMS and ACSES. Next, drop ATC and replace that with Cab Signal System (CSS) and then add in "ETMS with CSS" where applicable. Since ACSES generally needs CSS there is no reason to restate the presence of CSS in that case. For a stretch goal I would add tags for CTC and ABS, however in a global context indicating bi-directionality is less important, so maybe a single TCB tag for "track circuit block" can be used where ETMS is not present. In the (currently) few cases where ETMS s present without TCB, and "ETMS with TWC" tag could be used. 

In an ideal world ORM could "stripe" colors where multiple tags apply in a similar fashion to the Union Pacific employee timetables which at one point were managing CTC, ABS, TWC, ATS, ATC and CSS systems, but that would probably require significant development time.

If ORM had some clear way to make contributions I'd be down to make the more basic changes myself wiki-style, but I can't see exactly how to do that and e-mails are going unanswered. Leave a message in the comments if you know what I'm missing.

No Approach! The Duality of Uncommon Signals

We all learn about traffic lights in elementary school.  Red means stop, green means go and yellow means slow or caution. These are the basics of automatic block signaling that also tend to get taught in entry level railroading books. Now its pretty logical that a signal might lack the ability to display a clear indication. A permanent stop condition or the end of automatic block territory are both situations where a Clear signal would not ever apply. However there are a few situations where signals in North America can display Stop or Clear, but not Approach on the full speed head. 

The first is at interlockings outside of automatic block territory like a diamond crossing or drawbridge. The signal provides movement authority through the interlocking and without track circuits outside of the interlocking limits there is no "prepare to stop" points an Approach type signal would apply to. Trains will have their own movement authority like a track warrant so a clear signal is basically the interlocking telling the train "you do you". One might expect signals in this case to display a Restricting indication, instead of a clear, and sometimes they do, but that is going to come with a 20mph speed restriction, or less, which can be a time hit on unsignaled lines with higher track speeds. 

The next situation, Manual Block territory, would be very familiar to those in other parts of the world. Although almost extinct in the US, there remains a bit of manual block still in service on the LIRR and the way to identify a manual block signal is the lack of an approach indication. (This also applies in general to historic PRR signaling charts.) Signals will display Stop or Clear Block with any Approach functionality handled by a separate distant signal towards the end of the manual block. The PRR even went one further sometimes substituting the \ "Caution" indication in place of / Approach. 

Sometimes its really not good to have locomotives stopped and waiting at a specific signal,  Maybe there's an issue with a grade crossing, or noise, or diesel exhaust. In this case it would not be desirable for trains to approach that signal prepared to stop, so a preceding signal will either hold trains short or allow them to approach a signal with some sort of proceed indication. The most notable of these is at the entrance to Washington Union Stations 1st St tunnel that the currently diesel hauled northbound trains cannot enter without having a signal displayed further on that allows them to leave said tunnel. Another nearby signal location at CSX's LENFANT interlocking might lack southbound approach signals for a similar reason due to an overbuild.

One somewhat PRR-specific situation is where interlockings are provided with exit signals and because of the short distance between the interlocking's entrance signal and exit signal, Slow Approach is used instead of Approach. This creates an upper head that can only display --- Stop or | Clear. The C&O also made frequent use of exit signals, but seemed to keep their upper head Approach indication, although Medium Clear to exit Approach allowed the C&O to minimize the use of R/Y/Y/ Medium Clear.

A fairly new situation where Approach has been "omitted" involves high speed turnouts. At certain points on the NEC, Amtrak has decided to combine a flashing green "Cab Speed" signal indication with R/*Y* Medium Approach. At the end of a main track that converges into another via a high speed turnout, the result will be an upper head with green and red lamps/positions and no yellow lamp/position.
 

The River Line's Last Conrail Signals - Part 1

Over the years I have reported on the CSX re-signaling efforts on the former Conrail River Line along the west side of the Hudson River. These efforts go back to the early 2000's as CSX looked to increase capacity on the route after its takeover and culminated in the recent re-signaling of CP-SK in Selkirk, NY.  CP-SK was able to hold out as long as it did because it was itself completely re-signaled by Conrail immediately before the CSX/NS split, dropping the need for capital improvement way down on the list. However for those Hudson Valley Conrail fans looking to get signaling fix, two small islands of Conrail era signaling remains. 

Back in the 1960's, the old West Shore route was given a healthy dose of efficiency by the innovators at the  New York Central, changing a double track line into a single track with passing sidings spaced every 10 miles. This budget CTC system featured single block, restricted speed passing sidings about every 10 miles and fit in with the decline in northeast freight traffic, especially after the Penn Central and Conrail was able to divert traffic away from the former NY Central main line and the West Shore Route. However, as intermodal traffic picked up in the 1990s, Conrail found its River Line under capacity as every pass would require a painfully slow restricted speed pull-in.  Therefore it began to signal the sidings and modify the old New York Central small target searchlight signals to support Medium speed diverging routes, generally working south to north.

Just prior to the CSX takeover in 1999, Conrail was largely finished with this project, however for whatever reason the old passing siding between CP-104 and CP-106 was found to be lacking and the siding was expended a little over a mile to the south to a new CP-102 with CP-106 also being completely rebuilt. In the same project,  the siding at the southern end of the line from CP-22 to CP-24 was extended to a new CP-26. In a manner similar to CP-SK, CSX put replacing both these patches of late model Conrail signaling low down on the priority list and today these two sidings and some adjacent intermediate signals are the only remaining Conrail signals on the River Line. Here in Part 1 I will cover the northern island with CP-104, CP-106 and the intermediate at milepost 100.

With CP-106 directly adjacent to US 9W just south of Catskill, NY and CP-102 behind the quaint West Camp, NY post office, both locations are generally accessible and equipped with two Conrail target type color light masts, a 3-lamp Safetran dwarf stack, CorTen weathering steel relay huts and those iconic blue station signs.

The the 1008/1009 automatic signal, distant to CP-102, is just south of the Malden Turnpike grade crossing at River Line milepost 102 and also pretty easily accessible. This one makes use of premium US&S target type color light signals as opposed to the Safetran signals at the two interlockings.

In a future Part 2 I'll throw up some photos of CP-22 and CP-26 the next time I find myself driving to Upstate NY or New England. It's highly likely that CSX will also replace all these signals whenever some manager happens to notice the non-conformity. Moreover, without their presence there would not be much stopping CSX from a wholesale change in signal rules on the River Line from Conrail to Seaboard, so get out there and get your photos of R/*Y* Medium Approach while you still can. 

New Signals at IVANHOE

Just saw this pic of new signals going up at IVANHOE crossing on the former Conrail Porter Branch. Built as the Michigan Central's main line into Chicago, these are likely the mast Michigan Central style small target searchlights on the route along with an equally rare bracket mast so if you happen to be in the area get your but in gear and get out there to get some photos.

 IVANHOE is where the Porter Branch crosses the EJE belt line, now owned by CN. It once supported a well known interlocking tower that was closed and demolished in the 1990's.

Owned by CSX, but previously used as a back door into Chicago from the Conrail Chicago Line, now owned by NS, the Porter Branch has been in a bit of a limbo since the Conrail split of 1999 with a lot of the traffic being from other railroads.  Many of its interlockings are diamond crossings and have already been re-signaled, but the Branch still retained NYC vintage GRS style G block and interlocking signals on the eastern end of the line including CP-243 as of fall 2024.

I had the privilege of riding this line in the fall of 2006 on an Amtrak detouring around a serious Chicago Line derailment where I also got to see the since closed CALUMET tower. 

 
Anyway, I guess we'll have to wait and see if this is the beginning of end of interesting signaling on the porter Branch or just another chapter in a long slow decline.

Mind the Gap! - The case of "3rd Head Restricting"

There's a odd feature in current North American railroad signal practice dating back to the 19th century that hints at the practices of old like a vestigial organ. Lacking a former name, one might call the aspect "lowest head Restricting" or "3rd head Restricting", but its feature is a prominent gap between the top "full speed" or "normal route" head and the bottom lamp used to display Restricting indications. What would be a R/R/Y (or R/R/L) under normal circumstances, becomes R/ /Y, with the middle head omitted. So why does this exist and why is it still in use today.

Low head restricting originates in the concept of the subsidiary signal. In the days of mechanical semaphores a subsidiary signal is a smaller semaphore arm mounted below the "main" arms to give Restricting type movement authority.



In North America, it was not uncommon for this subsidiary signal to be mounted on the ground at the base of the mast or under the signal if mounted on a gantry or cantilever. The New Haven railroad was a proponent of this ground mounting practice and continued it up until they were folded into Penn Central.

As North American signaling progressed into the electric era, signal aspect systems would have an upper head for straight routes, a lower head for diverging routes and then a "subsidiary signal", either on the mast or on the ground, for Restricting/call-on conditions. Interlocking setups like the Taylor system would even have a separate lever controlling each signal head. Although this "third head" position on signals would later see use with other slow speed and combination indications like Medium Approach Medium, the link between the third head and Restricting remained strong. Of course as an economizing measure, some railroads went the route of only using two heads with R/Y as Restricting and simply not having a Diverging Approach type indication (its not strictly necessary). However, one could also economize by eliminating the middle head if it was only serving as a marker, especially if the lower "head" was its own signal on the actual ground. The Erie, along with the Reading, were both good examples of the gap between the upper and third head were left exceptionally large to avoid confusion.

 

 
Of course as signal mounting distances became more standardized, this gap became less emphasized to the point where one could make the argument that there was a likelihood of confusion between R/Y Diverging Approach and R/ /Y Restricting. Here we see an example of two bracket mounted signals with R/ /Y restricting at Chicago's KEDZIE interlocking installed by the CNW in the 1990's.

Today one can accommodate both R/Y Diverging Approach and a Restricting indication on a two headed mast through the use of lunar white or flashing red . At this time NS is the only major railroad to install new examples of R/ /Y Restricting and does so only on its former Southern RR signal territory. 

Of course quite a few railroads, including Canadian Pacific aligned Delaware and Hudson, never went with the economizing feature of the gap and instead went with a three head system with R/R/Y Restricting and R/Y/R Medium Approach. Under the Conrail associated NORAC system R/ /Y of predecessor roads like the Erie and Reading were considered to be a two head R/Y Restricting with three head R/R/Y Restricting as another option. The C&O on the other hand only had R/Y Restricting with any third head left dark because they just had to be different.